|
|
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
User reviews for the URC-200 "Automater" & RF-20 from Universal Remote Control Inc. |
| Ratings | Reviews | MSRP (USD) |
Average: 4.18/5.00 Median: 4.33/5.00 | 15 | $150 / $120 |
The URC-200 is a 10-device learning and preprogrammed remote control that features numerous macros, a large LCD screen with customizable names for 5 hard buttons, favorite channel macros, 5-way menu controls and an optional RF extender.
Get it at: | |
|
|
Now viewing user reviews page 1 of 3 for the URC-200 "Automater" & RF-20 remote.
|
|
Written by griz_fan from Meridian, ID USA. The reviewer has used this remote control for 3-6 months. |
Review 14 made on Tuesday November 28, 2006 at 11:13 PM. |
Also owned: |
Strengths: |
Weaknesses: |
|
Review: | There is a lot to like about this remote, but after having lived with it for a few months, I've noticed a few issues that have dimmed my initial enthusiasm. Generally speaking, the lack of built in device codes can easily be overcome through learning. The missing transport keys would have made DVR operations a lot easier, but I manage quite will with using soft keys for the missing stuff. Unstable macros has caused a lot of problems, though. For the first few months, no problems, but in the last few weeks, one of my macros (which switches everything over to satellite viewing) has decided to add a couple of extra steps (sending a signal for number 1 to the TV, causing the TV to switch from input 3 back to integrated tuner). My power on/off Macros have become increasingly flakey, too. To compound the problem, this remote really struggles to learn certain commands, especially for my Pioneer AV receiver. Even with using a OneForAll as a "middleman", most attempts to teach functions to the URC-200 only succeed after 20 or 30 attempts. I can't begin to describe the frustration this can cause. Finally, URC support is not good at all. They have an email support contact form on their website, but no one ever responds to these emails.
I really wish I could rate this remote higher. Generally, the quality is quite good, it has a strong feature set, and the price is right. But, It just doesn't work as well as it should, and the support just isn't there. Unless you are willing to spend many hours of your time trying to figure this out on your own, I would have to reccomend you look elsewhere. |
|
Quality: | Features: | Value: |
|
|
|
Written by jrfuda from San Antonio, TX. The reviewer has used this remote control for 1-3 months. |
Review 12 made on Wednesday February 22, 2006 at 12:36 PM. |
Strengths: |
Weaknesses: |
|
Review: | I've been an MX700 owner for over 3 years and wanted another remote to complement the MX700 - as a second remote to use from the kitchen/dining room from where all of the living room's components are viewable/listenable. I was torn amon the URC-200, URC-300, MX-500, and another MX-700.
- I ruled-out the URC-300 becuase I do not like touch screen remotes. - I ruled-out another MX-700 becuase it was nearly twice the cost of the URC-200 and MX-500 - I ruled-out the MX-500 becuase it's button layout did not quite match the layout of the MX-700 and I did not want to have to reprogram my feel and click (and have to remember if I was using the 500 or 700 each time) - I decided on the URC-200 becuase of its similarities to the MX-700. The only differences are --1. Lack of PC programabillity --2. Only 5 labeled buttons per screen and 10 devices vs 20
The lack of PC programability was made-up for by the ease of programing the URC-200. All-in-all it took me about 30% longer to fully program 9 devices (using both preprogrammed and learning) than it would have to do the same on my MX-700 using MX editor. Now, this ease of programming was facilitated by having the MX-700 handy to send discretes from, and to ensure a buton-for-button matchup from one remote to the next.
Here's how I did it: 1. I relabled each device in to the same order as I have them on my MX-700. 2. I then setup each device with preprogramed codes. 3. I then edited the button labels on each device to match the MX-700 (remapping a bit, of course, since the 200 shows 5 per page and the 700 shows 10). 4. I then learned directly from the MX-700 to the URC-200's like-labled keys. I also learned over a few of the non-custom labeled keys that did not function exactly as I wanted them to (I actually learned the MX700's punch throughs to the URC-200 rather than using the URC-200's punch through options).
This entire operation took about 45 minutes, including me putting batteries in the remote and reading the manual. I still have to porgram about 10 macros into the remote, so that may add another 10 minutes.
The remote controlled all of my components very well. I actually like the seperate directional arrow pad and select button better versus the MX-700's "joypad" that had all four directions and the select button consolidated. The URC-200's is much easier to control.
This remote is going to replace a Dish Network remote that was used from the kitchen. I got tired of having to go into the livig room to use the 700 when I needed a command the Dish remote couldn't handle. The Dish remote shall spend it's golden years in a drawer :) |
|
Quality: | Features: | Value: |
|
|
|
Written by Ronfl from Tampa Bay, FL. The reviewer has used this remote control for 3-6 months. |
Review 10 made on Monday June 20, 2005 at 11:28 AM. |
Strengths: |
Weaknesses: |
|
Review: | I am a diehard MX-500 user, still have my old one but wanted to upgrade to a newer unit. I saw the Unifier a.k.a. MX-350 Osiris and thought I would give it a try. I like the smaller footprint (than the MX-500/700/800, etc.) and silver color!
I am pleased to say that URC/Home Theater Master has maintained their quality standards and listen to users about want they want & need out of a universal remote. This is a great remote, especially for TiVo users. Excellent remote for those that prefer frequently used functions as a hard button rather than a “soft” key or touch pad.
Easy to program (especially since I have the MX-500, nearly identical programming methods), very nice macro features and back lighting. It took a while to get used to the “select” button which has changed from the MX-500 where it was a part of the center selection ring, to a separate button within the ring, now that I’m used to it, I like it.
It would have been cool to add a color screen or USB port; but sometimes less is more...This is a high quality “get the job done” remote. A+ |
|
Quality: | Features: | Value: |
|
|
|
Now viewing user reviews page 1 of 3 for the URC-200 "Automater" & RF-20 remote.
|
|
|
|